Legal Opinion

Davis v. Ungerman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1933No. 4604PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

This is a suit, coupled with a provisional seizure, to recover wages for work done in drilling an oil well. In the lower court plaintiff obtained judgment for $196, maintaining the provisional seizure and recognizing his privilege. The case was tried and judgment rendered January 17, 1933. Judgment was signed and filed the next day, and at the same time defendant was granted a suspensive and devolutive appeal to this court. Appeal bond was filed January 28, 1933.

The testimony taken at the trial was not reduced to writing. The only statement of facts found in the record is one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cohn Flour & Feed Co. v. MitchellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Hill v. TippettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  3. Theus v. KempSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  4. Le Blanc v. Broussard's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  5. State ex rel. Boudreau v. Judge of the Second District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gauthier v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Williams v. Credit Service CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Parker v. Charles Tolmas, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API