Legal Opinion

Veal v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1975No. 6649PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOULIG, Judge.

Plaintiff, Leon Veal, filed suit against his automobile liability insurer, Interstate Fire & Casualty Company, alleging defendant was liable to him and his children for damages resulting from an automobile accident under uninsured motorist insurance coverage. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted on the basis the defendant, an unauthorized insurer,1 was not required under our insurance code to provide uninsured motorist coverage in its surplus line policy issued to plaintiff and the omission of such coverage effectively precluded the recognition of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deane v. McGeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  2. Gray & Co. v. StilesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. W. L. Slayton & Co. v. Newton & MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
  4. Barrett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Veal v. Interstate Fire and Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  2. Veal v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API