Legal Opinion

Reynolds, Adr. v. Maust

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1940No. Appeal, 33PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldrige, J.,

Opinion by

This bill in equity was filed by the administrator of the estate of Margaret Reynolds, deceased, against the executrices of the last will and testament of Walker J. Reynolds, son of Margaret Reynolds, demanding a return of two $1,000 government bonds or an accounting of the proceeds and income received therefrom.

Our sole duty is to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to warrant a finding that the mother, who died September 23, 1936, intestate, made a valid gift inter vivos of these bonds to her son Walker, who died on October 24,1936. The learned chancellor,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCown v. FraserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Pierce v. Boston Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Allshouse's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Gibson's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Ries v. Ries's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tanner v. RobinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Welch v. HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1943
  3. Monongahela Trust Co. v. KazimerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Nettie Smith v. Hunter SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  5. Wann EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API