Legal Opinion

U. S. A., Inc. v. Kirkland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1977No. 53913, 53914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webb, Judge.

The indemnitor in a "Hold Harmless Agreement” agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the indemnitee "from any and all acts on the part of [indemnitor’s] employees engaged in providing security or store detectives.” The indemnitor was providing security services for indemnitee at its stores, and because of the actions of provided security guards, various claims for false arrest, malicious prosecution etc. were filed against both parties. Indemnitee called upon indemnitor to defend the actions but met with refusal. Subsequently the plaintiffs in the damage actions secured favorable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scarboro Enterprises, Inc. v. HirshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Southern Clays, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foster v. NixCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Alterman Foods, Inc. v. G. C. C. Beverages, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Carr v. NodvinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. U. S. A., Inc. v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API