Reed v. Hollister
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. W. R. Guy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BARDIN, J.,
pro tem.—This is an action by the plaintiff, 'as administrator of the estate of Frances S. Furry, deceased, 'to require the defendant to account for certain moneys alleged to constitute a part of the assets of the estate of said deceased. The plaintiff obtained judgment as prayed for and the defendant has appealed from the judgment. A statement, somewhat in detail, is necessary to a consideration of the points presented for review.
William H. Hollister, who was a resident of the state of 'New York, died in that state and his last will and testament was admitted to probate in that…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Childs v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Barreiro v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Barreiro v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Estate of CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Estate of AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.