Pine v. Mayor of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
The first question is whether the state of New York, in the exercise of its power of eminent domain, can enable the defendant, the city of New York, to erect within the limits of that state a dam across án unnavigable river having its source in ponds in the state of New York, and divert the water thereby accumulated to a great distance, for general distribution and use in the city of New York, and, by thus materially diminishing the flowage, substantially injure riparian rights in the state of Connecticut pertaining to a stream to which the river in New York is the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Head v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Scriver v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Brickett v. Haverhill Aqueduct Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Mannville Co. v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Wrona v. Board of Appeals of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Twin City Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- De Lucca v. City of North Little RockU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1905
- Loranger v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Bannse v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1913