Legal Opinion

Medin v. De Gennaro

New York County Courts

Decided April 2, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArchibald C. Wemple, J.

Plaintiff and defendants entered into a purchase offer and agreement made part of the offer on the 24th day of June, 1955. . Thereafter and on the 24th day of August of that year, the plaintiff and one of the defendants entered into a further separate agreement relating to the dryness of the cellar, and then another separate contract on the same date called “ Construction G-uarantee Contract.”

The purpose that rule 90 of the Buies of Civil Practice intends to accomplish is to fully inform an adverse party as to the extent of the claims being made against him, thus enabling him intelligently to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. DerschugAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. K. Egan & Co. v. ButterworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Frank Seaman, Inc. v. StirnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gauthier v. Port of New York AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API