Legal Opinion

Miller v. Doe

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1991No. 02A04-9004-CV-200PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Petitioners/ Appellants, Michael H. Miller (Michael) and Lisa Ann Heredia (Lisa), appeal the trial court's judgment dismissing a paternity action after Intervenors/Appel-lees, John and Jane Doe (Does), were granted leave to intervene and challenge the finding that Michael was the father of M.B.H., a child subject to an adoption proceeding by the Does. We reverse and remand.

Issues

I. Whether the juvenile court division of Allen Superior Court erred in finding that the probate division of Allen Superior Court had sole jurisdiction over the proceedings involving M.B.H.?

II…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chelovich v. Ruff & Silvian AgencyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. P.B. v. T.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adoptive Parents of M.L v. v. WilkensIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. W.G. v. D.B.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. C.L. v. Y.B.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In Re BWIndiana Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API