Legal Opinion

Kalis v. Shor

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 11, 1949No. [No. 26, October Term, 1949.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

This is an appeal by Samuel D. Kalis from a decree of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City, requiring the appellant, defendant below, to specifically perform a contract.

The plaintiff below, appellee here, advertised in her name and in the name of the auctioneer, leasehold property in Baltimore “together with the store and fixtures of Confectionery. Cigars, Tobacco, Soda Fountain, etc.” Why a period rather than a comma appears after the word “Confectionery” is not explained. This was evidently an error in the advertisement. The advertisement stated “ground rent $68.00.” At the time of the sale,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trotter v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Barranco v. KostensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Moran v. HammerslaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  4. Powell v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  5. United Railways & Electric Co. v. Henry Wehr & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beck v. BernsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  2. Globe Home Improvement Co., Inc. v. BrothersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API