Vendome Turkish Bath Co. v. Schettler
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County„ The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Scott, J.
— Appellant was a tenant occupying certain rooms in a building known as the “ Kilgen Block,” in the city of Seattle, and was conducting a bathing establishment therein. Appellee did some work for the appellant in the way of repairing, moving and refitting various steam and soil pipes, and in changing some of the other appliances used in carrying on said business, and furnished certain materials used in performing said work. Appellee’s claim being disputed, he filed a notice of a lien purporting to cover *458appellant’s leasehold interest in said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kellogg v. Littell & Smythe Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gilbert Hunt Co v. ParryWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Sagmeister v. FossWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Hildebrandt v. SavageWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Sound Transfer Co. v. Phinney Realty & Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- E. J. Post & Co. v. MilesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1893