Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1865PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error, to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny county. This was a scire facias on a mortgage by Lydia B. McKinney, surviving Alexander McKinney, deceased, for use of herself and Mary Oliver, against James Hamilton and Sarah his wife. Verdict for plaintiff, $119.50, and writ of error by plaintiff. Lydia McKinney, the plaintiff, was the daughter of Joseph Oliver, deceased, and Mary Oliver.

Read the full summary

Error, to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny county. This was a scire facias on a mortgage by Lydia B. McKinney, surviving Alexander McKinney, deceased, for use of herself and Mary Oliver, against James Hamilton and Sarah his wife. Verdict for plaintiff, $119.50, and writ of error by plaintiff. Lydia McKinney, the plaintiff, was the daughter of Joseph Oliver, deceased, and Mary Oliver. A lot of land in Pittsburgh, late the estate of her father, was decreed to her under proceedings in partition, subject to her mother’s dower, being the interest of $500 annually. Lydia sold this lot to…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Read, J.

— By proceedings in the Orphans’ Court the estate of Joseph Oliver was divided into six purparts, and one purpart, valued by the inquisition at $1500, was decreed to his daughter, Lydia Oliver, a minor, subject to the dower of her mother, Mary Oliver, viz.: the interest of $500, annually, during her natural life. Lydia, having intermarried with Alexander McKinney, sold and conveyed this purpart, consisting of a lot of ground, to Sarah Hamilton, wife of James K. Hamilton, Mary Oliver releasing her dower-interest to Mrs. Hamilton, as appears by…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Uccellini v. UccelliniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API