Legal Opinion

Hill v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 31, 1927No. Docket No. 5800Published

1. Action of respondent in disallowing for 1921 and 1923 deductions taken for interest paid, his action in increasing petitioner's distributive share of partnership profits for 1921 and in reducing the amount of depreciation taken in 1921 and 1923 approved because of insufficient evidence. 2. Action of respondent in determining that the petitioner made a profit in 1923 on the sale of a one-half interest in the furniture, fixtures and equipment of a hotel approved for lack of…

Read the full summary

1. Action of respondent in disallowing for 1921 and 1923 deductions taken for interest paid, his action in increasing petitioner's distributive share of partnership profits for 1921 and in reducing the amount of depreciation taken in 1921 and 1923 approved because of insufficient evidence. 2. Action of respondent in determining that the petitioner made a profit in 1923 on the sale of a one-half interest in the furniture, fixtures and equipment of a hotel approved for lack of sufficient evidence. 3. Petitioner in a prior year paid a contractor the amount due for materials furnished in making…

1Opinion of the Court

LENA G. HILL, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Hill v. Commissioner

Docket No. 5800.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

8 B.T.A. 1159; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2732;

October 31, 1927, Promulgated

1. Action of respondent in disallowing for 1921 and 1923 deductions taken for interest paid, his action in increasing petitioner's distributive share of partnership profits for 1921 and in reducing the amount of depreciation taken in 1921 and 1923 approved because of insufficient evidence.

2. Action of respondent in determining that the petitioner made a profit in 1923 on the sale of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hill v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API