Legal Opinion

Marshall Dental Manufacturing Co. v. Iowa

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 6, 1913No. 104PublishedCited by 12 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. The facts, which involve the title to a meandered lake in the State of Iowa, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a petition brought by the State of Iowa to enjoin the defendants from draining the waters of Goose Lake, in Greene County, Iowa. The defendant, now plaintiff in error, set up title, on the ground that the so-called lake, a tract of several hundred acres, was swamp land and was granted to the' State by the act of September 28,1850, c. 84, 9 Stat. 520; Rev. Stats. §2479; that it passed to Greene County by an act of the legislature of January 13, 1853, and thence by mesne conveyances to this' defendant. After a trial the court of first instance entered a decree for the plaintiff, and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Georgia v. Tennesssee Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. French v. FyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Sanitary District of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. United States v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Bernot v. MorrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API