Legal Opinion

Citibanc of Alabama/Tuskegee v. Potter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1980No. 78-577PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from a declaratory judgment subordinating a recorded judgment lien obtained by Citibanc to mortgages executed subsequent to the judgment lien and to a statutory claim of homestead exemption. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for entry of a judgment in conformity with this opinion.

The facts are best presented chronologically.

April 27, 1976: Citibanc obtained a judgment against Guy and Hazel Potter for $19,363.25 and costs of $27.50. The judgment was recorded the same day.

November 1, 1976: The Potters received a deed to the lot in question from their son, reciting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. PollakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Majors v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Cobleskill Savings & Loan Ass'n v. RickardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Compton v. SharpeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Southeast Alabama Medical Center & Golden Peanut Co. (In Re Holloway)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  2. James Stacey Conley and Angela Marie ConleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API