Legal Opinion

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Graef

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 2, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*221Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered September 21, 2005, which granted respondent’s cross motion to confirm an arbitration award of compensatory damages in the amount of $148,000, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioners have not established that the award was the product of fraud, misconduct or any partiality on the part of any of the arbitrators; that the arbitrators exceeded their authority in any way; that the arbitration was procedurally defective; or that the award was irrational or violative of a strong public policy (see Hackett v Milbank, Tweed,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers' Union of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Hackett v. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adolphe v. New York City Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Zinger v. KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API