Legal Opinion

Maples v. Klimist

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1964No. 7565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FANNING, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellee sued defendant-appellant for breach of a written order for store fixtures and sought a judgment for monetary damages.

Plaintiff-appellee filed a motion for summary judgment as to liability but not as to damages. This motion was contested by defendant-appellant. The trial court granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as to liability and ordered the cause to proceed to trial upon the issue as to damages, from which summary judgment defendant-appellant has appealed.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order entered by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Minchen v. MurrahCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Houston v. Socony Mobil Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API