Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,370 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Koracorp Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 24, 1978No. 76-2547 and 76-2964PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brought these two suits to obtain injunctions preventing the defendants from committing future violations of the anti-fraud and reporting provisions of the federal securities laws. The district judge granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The SEC appeals, contending that since material issues of fact are in dispute, the district court abused its discretion in granting summary judgment. We agree with the SEC with respect to all of the defendants except Arthur Andersen & Co. (“Andersen”). With respect to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- George McGinest v. Gte Service Corp. Mike BiggsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LawbaughDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Odessa Union Warehouse Co-Op Cecil A. Schell Edward Sewall Marvin KleynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.