Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Hennessey

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 28, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, President Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of the Pennsylvania House Republican Caucus, intervenor in this ease, to quash various subpoenas issued by Petitioners. The original three-count Complaint filed in this Court’s original jurisdiction requested preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. Petitioners allege that several newsletters sent on behalf of Representative Timothy Hennessey are “political advertisements” and, thus, should have been included as campaign expenses. Count I sought declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of the First…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Consumers Education & Protective Ass'n v. NolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Alfred D. Schiaffo, in No. 72-2168 v. Henry Helstoski, in No. 72-2167Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. John J. Hoellen v. Frank AnnunzioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. In re Nomination Petitions of OwenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. In re Petition to Audit Campaign Finance Reports of CartwrightCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. McNaughton v. McNaughton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County2005
  5. William Penn SD v. PA Department of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API