Legal Opinion
Digital Equipment Corp. v. Currie Enterprises
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 4, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 91-11624-WDPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*10ORDER RE: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO STAY DISCOVERY (DOCKET ENTRY #63); DEFENDANT PALMISCIANO’S MOTION FOR A STAY OF PROCEEDING (DOCKET ENTRY #70); DEFENDANT BLAKELEY’S MOTION FOR A STAY OF PROCEEDING (DOCKET ENTRY #87); MOTION OF DEFENDANT FRED P. KLEIN-ERMAN FOR STAY OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS (DOCKET ENTRY # 92); and DEFENDANT PHILIP M. CARNOVALE’S MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDING (DOCKET ENTRY #127)
BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants Dennis Palmisciano, Fred P. Kleinerman, Bradford Blakeley and Philip M. Carnovale (hereinafter “defendants”) each…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Microfinancial, Inc. v. Premier Holidays International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. Fresenius Medical Care North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- King v. Olympic Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GasawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- In Re CFS-Related Securities Fraud LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.