Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Brown

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcGeehan, J.

The plaintiff instituted an action to foreclose two mortgages. The defendant has interposed an answer affirmatively alleging usury both as an affirmative defense and as a counterclaim. The plaintiff has interposed no reply to the alleged counterclaim. Upon the trial the plaintiff adduced proof as to the mortgage and the alleged default and rested. The defendant then moved for judgment on the counterclaim and rested. Thus a question of law is presented for this court’s determination. The defendant maintains that inasmuch as a counterclaim has been alleged by failing to reply to the allegations…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. CuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Walker v. American Central InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. McCrea v. HopperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Prouty v. EatonNew York Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Myers v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McNellis v. RaymondDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API