Legal Opinion
Smith v. Porter
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1854PublishedCited by 3 opinions
ERROR to the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.
Case for slanderous words. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.
The record does not purport to contain all the evidence.
Elder v. Robins, 2 Ind. 210.—Montgomery v. Doe d. Pearson, 4 Ind. 266. And even if it did, the party moving for a new trial superseded that motion by a motion in arrest of judgment. Rogers v. Maxwell, 4 Ind. 243.—Bepley v. The State, id. 264.
We see nothing in the record which the latter motion would reach.
Per Curiam. — The judgment is affirmed with costs.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rogers v. MaxwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
- Elder v. RobinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
- Montgomery v. Doe on the demise of PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by3 opinions
- Yazel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. CaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Grider v. ScharfIndiana Supreme Court · 1947