Legal Opinion

Quintana v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1891No. 3092PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of El Paso. Tried below before Hon. T. A. Falvey. The case is .sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was tried and convicted for bringing a stolen horse into this State, after having committed the theft of said horse in the Territory of ilew Mexico, and his punishment assessed at five years confinement in the penitentiary. From this conviction an appeal is prosecuted to this court.

There is a bill of exception reserved to the charge as an entirety, in which the only objection urged is thus stated: “Because the same did not instruct the jury fully upon the law governing in this case under the facts proved.” The court’s qualification of this bill of exception is thus…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. State v. ClintonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. Commonwealth v. BonnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Commonwealth v. HarlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  5. Commonwealth v. MullenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harrold v. Territory of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Misher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Hogue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API