Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sam Duty v. Norton-Alcoa Proppants

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 18, 2002No. 01-1478Published

1ConcurrenceNangle, District Judge

I concur with the majority opinion herein. However, I feel compelled to provide further comment on one issue in the case: the major life activity of working.5

Although the majority’s opinion correctly states and applies the law as it currently stands, I remain concerned that the EEOC regulations defining the “major life activity of working” have expanded the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) protections beyond the intent or expectations of Congress. Mr. Duty established his Arkansas Civil Rights Act (“ACRA”) claim by asserting that his disability substantially limits his ability to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Mullins v. CrowellDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API