Hardy v. State

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Chief Judge.

A jury found Charles Hardy (Movant) guilty of first-degree murder. After this court affirmed the conviction, 1 Movant filed a pro se Rule 29.15 2 motion alleging some 43 grounds for post-conviction relief. Per Rule 29.15(e), appointed counsel filed a five-claim amended motion, but also “incor-poratefd] by attachment all of [Movant’s] pro se claims.” 3 The motion court denied relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant’s appeal raises two points.

Failure to Impeach re Victim’s Location When Shot

We need not detail the facts summarized in Hardy, 197 S.W.3d at 251-52,…