Legal Opinion
Voges v. Borough of Tinton Falls
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 15, 1993PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
268 N.J. Super. 279 (1993)
633 A.2d 566
GERD VOGES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS, MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS, ANTHONY MUSCILLO, BOROUGH ADMINISTRATOR, BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS, LOUIS RAUPP, CONSTRUCTION OFFICIAL, BOROUGH OF TINTON FALLS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 29, 1993.
Decided November 15, 1993.
Before Judges LONG and LANDAU.
Paul A. Massaro argued the cause for appellant.
Sharon Handrock Moore argued the cause for respondents (Gebhardt & Kiefer, attorneys; Ms. Moore, on the brief).
The opinion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Service Armament Co. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Kirk v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Perez v. CucciDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sperling v. TeplitskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Communications Workers v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Communications Workers v. WhitmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Moody v. Township of MarlboroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Zelma v. Total Remodeling, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.