Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Coker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1975No. 5491PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JAMES, Justice.

This case involves the right of Plaintiffs to take a non-suit under Rule 164, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The trial court refused to allow the Plaintiffs to take a non-suit, whereupon the court granted Defendant’s motion for instructed verdict and entered judgment for Defendant, from which Plaintiffs appeal. We reverse and render.

This was a suit brought by the purchasers under a contract for sale of land against the seller to recover damages for breach of a fiduciary relationship. Trial was to a jury, and after Plaintiffs and Defendant had rested, Defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Columbian Carbon Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Texas Electric Ry. v. CoxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Corder v. CorderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Roberts v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mainland Savings Ass'n v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Coker v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Stanzel v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API