Legal Opinion

Franciscus v. Franciscus

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 1, 1976No. 760, September Term, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

The limited issue presented by this appeal is whether Judge Albert L. Sklar, sitting in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City, abused his discretion when he denied the appellant’s “Motion to Set Aside Decree Pro Confesso.” For the reasons stated infra, we hold that Judge Sklar did not abuse his discretion.

The record reveals that the appellee, Rosemary Franciscus, filed in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City, on July 3, 1974, a petition for custody of her and appellant’s two minor children. 1 The appellant, John A. Franciscus, a resident of Puerto Rico, was served with process by registered…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Keen v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Barnard v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  4. Burns v. BinesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Miller v. TalbottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. KennedyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Rypma v. StehrCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Fritz v. FritzCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. In re Guardianship No. 89-CA-9865Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API