Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Diagnostic Research Group and John R. Holcomb, M.D. v. Sushma Vora
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided August 19, 2015No. 04-15-00029-CVPublished
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Patricia 0. Alvarez, Justice,
concurring and dissenting.
I agree with the majority's opinion that Dr. Amy Mulroy is' qualified. I also concur in the majority’s conclusion that Appel-lee Sushm'a Vora’s negligence causes of action asserted against Appellants Diagnostic Research Group are not health care liability claims pursuant to the TMLA.
The majority also concludes 'DRG failed to show it was duly licensed, certified, registered, or chartered by the State of Texas to provide health' care. I agree. I do not agree, however, with the majority’s blanket conclusion that because DRG (1) failed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Transitional Care Centers of Texas, Inc. v. PalaciosTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Bowie Memorial Hospital v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Jelinek v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Certified Ems, Inc. D/B/A Cpns Staffing v. Cherie PottsTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Fredericksburg Care Co. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.