Legal Opinion

Ward v. . Ward

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1802Published

1Opinion of the Court

The cases cited to prove this a delivery do not come up to what is wished. This is not a delivery in law, and I believe, from the circumstances, was not so intended by the father. He knew a deed without delivery was not effectual; but his children, who were dissatisfied at the prospect of his marrying again, did not know it, and the old man adopted this mode of procuring his peace.

Decree according to the prayer of the bill.

NOTE. — See Kirk v. Turner, 16 N.C. 14; Vanhook v. Barnett,15 N.C. 268; Tate v. Tate, 21 N.C. 22; Moore v. Collins, 15 N.C. 384;Gibson v. Partee, 19 N.C. 530; Clayton v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kirk Ex Rel. Kirk v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1826
  2. Tate v. . TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  3. Moore v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  4. Vanhook Ex Rel. Newbern Bank v. BarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
  5. Waddell v. . HewittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API