Legal Opinion

Zook v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 12, 1948No. 15,908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This action was brought to review a decision of the Director of Revenue making a deficiency assessment against plaintiff in error under the Emergency Retail Sales Tax Act of 1935 (S.L. ’35, c. 189). It involvés the construction of section 2(n) of the act as applied to camelback, cushion gum, rubber cement and cord used in retreading motor vehicle tires. It was contended by plaintiff that sales of such commodities to persons engaged in the business of recapping and retreading tires were not taxable in that they were commodities of tangible personal property which became an ingredient of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Bedford v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  3. Carpenter v. Carman Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  4. In re I. Rheinstrom & Sons Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1913
  5. Armature Exchange, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Samper v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Unitog Rental Services, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. State ex rel. AMF Inc. v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. O.K. Rubber Welding System v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  5. Samper v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API