Legal Opinion

Malpeso v. Burstein & Fass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered October 31, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by plaintiffs brief, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs cause of action for legal malpractice for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs claim of legal malpractice based on defendants’ representation of him at a bail hearing is precluded as a mat*477ter of law by his guilty plea (Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169). We reject plaintiffs argument that Carmel does not apply where, as here, no claim is made that the alleged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carmel v. LunneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Bass & Ullman v. ChanesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MilotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. EsmailAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. DemagallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API