Legal Opinion

Hurt v. Perryman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

The only question for determination is whether the defendant is “the head of a family,” within the meaning of our exemption laws, so as to entitle Mm to tire exemptions provided by section 7701 of the Code.

The chancellor and the Court of Appeals have concurred in finding the following facts:

1. Defendant is twenty-six years of age and has never been married.

2. The father of defendant died in March, 1930, survived by his widow, four sons, and two daughters, but left no estate.

3. Defendant, ever since his father’s death, has rented a home where his mother and three minor brothers have lived with…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Forehand v. ForehandCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API