Legal Opinion

Hazen v. Cook

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1982No. CA 19800, SC 28611PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION.

Plaintiffs sued on a promissory note which provided for recovery of “reasonable attorney’s fees” in an action to collect the debt. The trial court found that the note was usurious and entered judgment that the defendants pay the amount of the note to the State of Oregon for use of the Lane County School Fund pursuant to former ORS 82.120(5). The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiff. 55 Or App 66, 637 P2d 195 (1981). The court denied the demand of both parties for attorney fees. 56 Or App 407, 642 P2d 318 (1982). Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dan Bunn, Inc. v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. UNITED STATES NAT. BANK OF OREGON v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hazen v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Hazen v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Skaggs v. HendgenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. Packer v. WardwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API