Legal Opinion

George R. Stowers v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1993No. 92-3177Published

1Opinion of the Court

985 F.2d 292

1993 A.M.C. 2992

George R. STOWERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-3177.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 10, 1992.

Decided Feb. 8, 1993.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc

Denied April 6, 1993.

Joel Levin, Marshall I. Nurenberg (argued and briefed), Nurenberg, Plevin, Heller & McCarthy, Cleveland, OH, for plaintiff-appellant.

William F. Gibson (argued and briefed), Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Cleveland, OH, for defendant-appellee.

Before: JONES and RYAN, Circuit Judges; and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

RYAN,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. P. C. Pfeiffer Co. v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. SchwalbSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Stockman v. John T. Clark & Son of Boston, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  5. John F. Harmon v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API