David Ferrell v. Larry Norris
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Inmate David Ferrell appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. To the extent he has not waived his claims against the Arkansas Depart ment of Correction (ADC) defendants by failing to address those claims on appeal with any specificity, see Meyers v. Starke, 420 F.3d 738, 743 (8th Cir.2005), we agree with the court that Ferrell failed to offer evidence that he administratively exhausted the claims, see King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052-53 & n. 2 (8th Cir.) (reviewing de novo district court’s interpretation of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mason v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- C.N. Ex Rel. J.N. v. Willmar Public Schools, Independent School District No. 347Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Mindy Bloom v. Metro Heart Group of St. Louis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- King v. Iowa Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Meyers v. StarkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Waller v. KelleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013