Fournier v. Roed
North Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceKnudson, Judge
(concurring specially)-
I concur in the result reached by the majority, but for different reasons.
The question before this Court is whether the sheriff of Ramsey County has lawful custody of Fournier under a legal and valid commitment by the county justice as committing magistrate.
Before entering into a discussion of the questions raised, we should consider the scope of inquiry and rules which must be applied in determination of an application for a writ of habeas corpus.
It is well settled in this state that the writ of habeas corpus can be invoked only when the person is confined without…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ker v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State ex rel. City of Augusta v. LosbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.