Wallace v. Floyd
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the District Court of Allegheny county. The facts of this case sufficiently appear in the opinion of Mr. Justice Armstrong.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Armstrong, J.
Nathan Floyd, who was plaintiff below, brought suit against W. W. Wallace, for three years and three months’ services as clerk at Iron City Furnace. He declared in assumpsit in the common counts and on a quantum meruit. The pleas were non assumpsit, payment, &e. The cause was arbitrated, and an award filed in favour of plaintiff for $299.14, from which he appealed, and on a trial in court obtained a verdict for $650. The defendant, Wallace, moved for a new trial, and on the 17th of March, 1854, after argument, by consent of counsel, on…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Conrad v. Ellison-Harvey Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1917
- Smith v. ShallcrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Deitchman v. KorachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
- Otten v. San Francisco Hotel Owners Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Osterling v. Allegheny Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.