In Re Mopsik
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
902 So.2d 991 (2005)
In re Norman MOPSIK.
No. 2004-B-2395.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 24, 2005.
Rehearing Denied June 24, 2005.
Charles Bennett Plattsmier, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Eric Kelly Barefield, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Robin Marie DeSalle-Pittman, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for Applicant.
Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, LLP, Frederick R. Bott, Beverly Ann Aloisio, Norman Mopsik, New Orleans, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") filed formal charges against respondent, Norman Mopsik, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana. The disciplinary…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Kimball; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Kimball.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. BoutallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- In Re BoltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- In Re: Dante Jerome ButlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2019