Legal Opinion

King Co. v. Seed

New York City Court

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order granted in an action of replevin.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.

This is an action of replevin commenced by plaintiff against the defendants Luengene and Richard Roe to recover possession of certain furniture which plaintiff alleges he is the absolute owner of, and which is in the possession of Luengene, who refuses to return it to plaintiff. There is no claim that Richard Roe was intended to represent any one in the matter whose name was unknown or who had any interest in the litigation. The plaintiff, by virtue of sections 1694 to 1699 of the Code of Civil Procedure, required the sheriff to replevy the furniture, giving the undertaking according to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heffern v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Goldstein v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Rosenberg v. CourtneyNew York City Court · 1894
  4. Heffern v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API