Cordiell v. Frizell
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from tbe District Court of tbe First Judicial District of tbe State of Nevada, Hon. R. S. MesicK presiding. Tbe. facts of tbe. case are stated in the opinion. This cause was argued orally, and no brief is on file on the part of appellant.
Read the full summary
Appeal from tbe District Court of tbe First Judicial District of tbe State of Nevada, Hon. R. S. MesicK presiding. Tbe. facts of tbe. case are stated in the opinion. This cause was argued orally, and no brief is on file on the part of appellant. The brief of respondent is an argument as to the construction of the several sections of the State Constitution and Territorial statutes bearing on this case, and cannot well be abridged so as to bring it within such reasonable space as to allow of its insertion in these reports. The points of this brief on which the case turns are noticed in the…
1Concurrence
Opinion by
Beatty, J.,
full Bench concurring.
This is a proceeding instituted by plaintiff or relator to establish his right to the office of Assessor of Storey County. The facts are these: The defendant, at the September election, 1862, was elected Assessor of Storey County, and thereafter qualified and entered on the duties of his office. He was elected under the provisions of the Act of 1861, which requires an Assessor to be elected every two years, and that they shall give bonds, etc., before entering on the duties of their office. This law does not say, in direct terms, how long the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. DietrichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1904
- Broadbent v. BrumbackIdaho Supreme Court · 1888
- State Ex Rel. Kline v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Roney v. School District of Scranton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1879