Legal Opinion · Dissent

Noland v. Noland

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 11, 1996No. CA 95-167Published

1DissentJohn B. Robbins, Judge

I disagree with the prevailing opinion in two respects. First, I believe that the chancellor erred in shifting the burden of proof from Claude Noland to the defendants. Appellee Claude Noland brought this action seeking to set aside Wesley Noland’s trust and warranty deed. The appellants defended the action contending that the trust and warranty deed were legitimate expressions of Wesley Noland’s intent. Secondly, I do not believe that the trial court held that a joint tenant cannot convey his joint interest to a third party and by so doing dissolve the joint tenancy.

The chancellor found that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greenwood v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. McDaniel ad. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1858
  3. Looney v. Estate of WadeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Orr v. LoveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Short v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API