Legal Opinion

Searcy v. Searcy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 13, 2006No. S05A1816, S05A1819PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENHAM, Justice.

We granted two petitions for interlocutory review of an order issued in a divorce action addressing questions of venue, joinder, and the type of assets which may be awarded as alimony. In the divorce action Gloria Searcy (hereinafter, “Wife”) filed against Floyd Searcy (hereinafter, “Husband”), Wife sought to join as defendants the estates of Husband’s late parents. Her rationale for seeking joinder was her assertion that his one-third undivided interest in the undistributed estates constitutes a majority of Husband’s assets. The trial court noted in its order the estates were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Meeks v. KirklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  3. Sanders v. HeppSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Spain v. SpainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Natpar Corp. v. E. T. Kassinger, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hollberg v. Spalding CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API