Carl v. Carl

Potter, P. J.,

17th judicial district, specially presiding, — On May 15, 1923, this case was duly tried, resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff of $322.86, being the full amount of her claim, with interest. A motion was then made for judgment non obstante veredicto, which was duly argued, which we now have before us for disposal.

At the trial of this case it was a grave question in the mind of the court whether or not we would not give binding instructions for the defendant. At the trial we did not have the opportunity nor the time to carefully consider the questions arising incident to the…