Legal Opinion

Michael Evans v. Multnomah County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 21, 2012No. 10-35215Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Michael Evans appeals the district court’s: (1) grant of partial summary judgment in favor of Multnomah County on his battery claim stemming from the actions of Sergeant Catherine Gorton; (2) grant of partial summary judgment in favor of the County on his claim for malicious prosecution; (3) denial of Evans’s motion for mistrial; (4) order sustaining the County’s objection to Evans’s proposed use of a rebuttal witness; and (5) denial of Evans’s motion to amend the verdict form. 1

We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand the district…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. General Signal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. Canyon Television & Appliance Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Arlene Galdamez v. John Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API