Legal Opinion

Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen v. Minnesota Department of Human Services; Minnesota Sex Offender Program

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 24, 2026No. 0:25-cv-03377Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen, No. 25-cv-3377 (KMM/DJF) Petitioner, v. ORDER Minnesota Department of Human Services; and Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Respondents. In a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) dated February 12, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster recommended that Petitioner Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen’s Petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied, the action be dismissed, and that no certificate of appealability be issued. (Dkt. 12.) Judge Foster concluded that the Petition should be denied because Mr. Senty-Haugen…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Larry Grinder, Edward A. Loetel v. James A. Gammon Dora B. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  2. Howard P. Parette, Jr. v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction Willis SargentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. Donald G. Whatley v. Paul J. Morrison, Michael GrooseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API