Legal Opinion

Fette v. Peters Construction Co

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 2015No. Docket 320803PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

In this contract dispute, plaintiffs, Daniel Fette and the Berrien County Board of Public Works, appeal as of right from the trial court’s order confirming an arbitrator’s award of approximately $45,300 in favor of defendant. Defendant, Peters Construction Co., cross-appeals from that same order. We affirm.

I. BASIC FACTS

Defendant and plaintiffs entered into a contract for a construction project, which included installing a water main under railroad tracks. During the project, defendant encountered some “unforeseen subsurface conditions” that, according to it, were not anticipated in the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. GavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Saffian v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Southfield Educ. Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ. of the Southfield Pub. Sch.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Nickola v. Mic General Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Arthur Breithaupt v. Howard Melam Family LpMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Basem Komis v. Kimberly R Basehart-GaetanoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Cnj Financial Group LLC v. Betty McKenneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API