Legal Opinion
Mendola v. Richmond OB/GYN Associates
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Anthony I. Giacobbe, J.
On the second day of jury trial in this medical malpractice action, the defendant made an oral application to preclude the proposed medical testimony of plaintiff Kathryn Mendola’s treating physicians, Drs. Brandéis, Mann and Edwards, as *700well as plaintiff’s treating psychologist, Dr. Glazer, upon the ground, that plaintiff failed to provide medical reports of these doctors in accordance with the provisions of 22 NYCRR 202.17, entitled “Exchange of medical reports in personal injury and wrongful death actions.” The plaintiff acknowledges that no such…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDougald v. GarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Freeman v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Zimmerman v. Jamaica Hospital, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Ciriello v. VirguesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- McDougald v. GarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. VohrerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009