Legal Opinion
Talmadge v. Duck (In re Talmadge)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 17, 1987No. 86-2836PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Michael and Gail Talmadge are joint debtors who appeal the district court’s reversal of a bankruptcy judge’s ruling in their favor. Appellants argue that when a joint bankruptcy petition is filed, California exemptions must apply separately to each spouse so that the maximum dollar amount allowed by the statute can be doubled. Appellee Charles Duck is the appointed trustee who objected to the Talmadges’ claim of exemptions contained in the appellants’ joint bankruptcy petition. He argues that appellants had exceeded the maximum dollar amount, available under…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Zablocki v. RedhailSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Califano v. JobstSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,935 Vance L. Ragsdale v. John Frederick Haller AKA Fred HallerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Muriel Nash Reaves, Fka Muriel Adams Reaves, Debtor. William Little v. Muriel Nash ReavesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Sticka v. Applebaum (In Re Applebaum)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re RegevigUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2008
- Little v. Reaves (In Re Reaves)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Kipperman v. Proulx (In Re Burns)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.