Legal Opinion

Baldonado v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2006No. 24,821PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARID, Judge.

{1} This case presents us with an opportunity to reconsider our decision in Moreno v. Marrs, 102 N.M. 373, 695 P.2d 1322 (Ct.App.1984) in which we adopted the “fireman’s rule.” We disavow Moreno to the extent it created an exception to generally applicable rules for determining the persons to whom an actor owes a duty of care. We also consider and reject Plaintiffs’ attempt to expand the scope of the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress. We consider and reject Defendant’s attempt to engraft additional elements onto the tort of intentional infliction of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Baldonado v. El Paso Natural Gas CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Akins v. United Steel Workers of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Jennifer Zeno-Ethridge and Dennis Ethridge v. Comcast CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
  4. United Tort v. Quorum Health Resources, LLC (In re Otero County Hospital Ass'n)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  5. Nelson v. Bolles (In re Bolles)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API