Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Quisenberry

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1887PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Morgan Circuit Court, Hon. E. L. Edwards, Judge. The case is stated iu the opinion. I. The defendant was entitled to a trial upon the issues raised by his plea in abatement, before being compelled to go to trial upon the merits. Rev. Stat., sect. 439. II. This was a suit by attachment brought before a justice of the peace.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Morgan Circuit Court, Hon. E. L. Edwards, Judge. The case is stated iu the opinion. I. The defendant was entitled to a trial upon the issues raised by his plea in abatement, before being compelled to go to trial upon the merits. Rev. Stat., sect. 439. II. This was a suit by attachment brought before a justice of the peace. In the justice’s court a plea in the nature of a plea in abatement was filed, and the justice refused to hear any evidence thereon, but merely made an order sustaining the attachment. In the circuit court defendant offered to file a plea in abatement, which was…

1Opinion of the CourtPhilips, P. J.

This action was begun in a justice’s court. The statement of the cause of action alleged, substantially, that on the first day of March, 1885, plaintiff was the owner of an undivided fifteen-sixteenths interest in certain lands situated in Morgan county; that on said .day the defendant entered into the possession of said interest, and used and occupied the same, and made a crop thereon during said year; that the whole of the premises so occupied were reasonably worth the sum of eighty dollars, and the fifteen-sixteenths interest of plaintiff therein- was worth seventy-five dollars, for which…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cannon v. McManusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852
  2. Hicks v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Duncan v. ForgeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Phillips v. BlissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862
  5. Sharkey v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. QuisenberryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Meyers v. BoydMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Jones v. Chicago, Burlington & Kansas City Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Newman v. YorkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Rechnitzer v. Missouri Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API